Konstantina Zivla

INTERPOL Red Notices Lawyer | Associate Member at Guernica 37 Chambers (G37) | ECtHR | World-Check & LexisNexis Data Removal | Research in Law Enforcement & Police Accountability | Member of DELF, ECBA, CBA & IBA

Share:

INTERPOL’s CCF: An Appellate Court?

As a specialised legal body within the International Criminal Police Organization, the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) plays an essential yet often misunderstood role. Unlike judicial entities, the CCF is not an appellate body but a regulatory one, tasked with ensuring that INTERPOL’s data processing meets stringent internal standards.

First, the CCF’s core function under Article 31 of its statute is to monitor and ensure that INTERPOL’s processing of personal information adheres to its strict regulations. This includes overseeing correction, deletion, and access to data within the INTERPOL Information System, such as red notices. Notably, the CCF does not assess guilt or adjudicate criminal matters.

Second, the CCF does not revisit or overturn lower courts’ findings; its role is strictly regulatory. It ensures that all data handled by INTERPOL is processed according to the organization’s internal legal framework. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity and reliability of international law enforcement collaborations.

Third, while the CCF can conduct limited fact-finding to verify compliance with INTERPOL’s rules, it does not engage in extensive investigations or determine the merits of cases. This constrained role helps maintain focus on procedural legality without stepping into the realms of criminal investigation or judgment.

Fourth, requests for data correction or deletion are processed strictly within the boundaries of established legal protocols. When data processing exceeds these boundaries (ultra vires), it is immediately considered null and void. This strict adherence to legal standards prevents overreach and protects against potential data misuse within INTERPOL’s vast network.

Thus, the CCF’s role is regulatory, not judicial. Its decisions to delete data, like red notices, are procedural and do not impact criminal responsibility at the national level. Criminal adjudication remains under national jurisdictions, independent of CCF actions, preserving the integrity of local legal processes within global law enforcement frameworks.

If you need more help feel free to contact us.


Related Posts

16

Dec
INTERPOL headquarters illustrating international police cooperation and cross-border law enforcement coordination
INTERPOL’s Jurisdiction and Objectives

INTERPOL does not have independent law enforcement jurisdiction and exercises no arrest, investigative, or executive powers. Established in the early twentieth century and restructured after World War II, INTERPOL’s mandate is limited to facilitating international police cooperation among its member states, in accordance with national laws and the INTERPOL Constitution. Under Article 2 of its …

5

Dec
Graphic illustrating the global misuse of INTERPOL Red Notices by authoritarian regimes and the risks individuals face when travelling internationally.
Red Notices: A Powerful Tool in Dangerous Hands

When a client facing an overseas criminal investigation (and possibly politically motivated) quietly asks, “Is it safe for me to travel?”, they are not expressing concern about logistical inconvenience. They are, often without realising it, raising a far deeper legal dilemma: whether the coercive reach of an abusive state can follow them across borders through …

30

Nov
A landscape view of Cyprus with coastal mountains, used to illustrate INTERPOL, extradition issues, and the occupied area of Northern Cyprus.
INTERPOL’s Blind Spot: Occupied Cyprus

As a Cypriot lawyer specialising in INTERPOL and cross-border criminal law, I am frequently asked whether extradition is possible from the occupied area of Cyprus, commonly referred to as “Northern Cyprus” or the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). The answer is clear and strictly legal: no. The so-called TRNC is recognised only by …

25

Nov
“Header image showing INTERPOL Red Notice and Yellow Notice symbols with the title ‘INTERPOL and Parental Child Abduction
INTERPOL and Parental Child Abduction

Parental Child Abduction International Parental Child Abduction (IPCA) represents one of the most challenging areas of cross-border family law. When a child is wrongfully removed to or retained in another jurisdiction without the other parent's consent, and informal or diplomatic efforts fail, the situation becomes legally complex and difficult to resolve. The paramount consideration must …

21

Nov
Analysis of INTERPOL’s immunity and the El Omari v. INTERPOL ruling on whether individuals can sue over abusive Red Notices.
Can You Sue INTERPOL?

As of 12 September 2025, the short answer remains No. An individual cannot sue INTERPOL for harm caused by the publication or circulation of a Red Notice. Despite the increasing number of people claiming that politically motivated or abusive notices have targeted them, INTERPOL is immune from legal proceedings before domestic courts. The most recent …

20

Nov
INTERPOL–UN Security Council Special Notice banner illustrating global sanctions enforcement.
INTERPOL and UN Sanctions: Any Relationship?

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) carries a unique mandate under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: the preservation of international peace and security. When military action is not appropriate, Article 41 empowers the Council to impose non-military sanctions, including asset freezes, arms embargoes, and travel bans. However, these measures only have real impact when …