Konstantina Zivla

INTERPOL Red Notices Lawyer | Associate Member at Guernica 37 Chambers (G37) | ECtHR | World-Check & LexisNexis Data Removal | Research in Law Enforcement & Police Accountability | Member of DELF, ECBA, CBA & IBA

Share:

Red Notice: Presumption of Guilt?

The existence of a Red Notice does not imply that the individual concerned is guilty. It must not be treated as evidence of guilt, in line with the Presumption of Innocence protected under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Individuals subject to Red Notices generally fall into one of the following categories: a) Suspects in a criminal investigation, b) Persons formally accused of an offence, c) individuals already convicted by a competent court.

Despite common public misconceptions, a Red Notice is not an international arrest warrant. It only serves as a mechanism to facilitate extradition and should be understood as an invitation to INTERPOL’s 196 member countries to assist in locating and, where permissible under national laws, provisionally arrest a person wanted for prosecution or to serve a sentence [(Articles 10.2 and 82 of INTERPOL’s Rules on the Processing of Data (RPD)].

To issue a Red Notice, the requesting country must provide a valid national arrest warrant or an equivalent judicial decision, along with a clear summary of the case. This includes the relevant facts, charges, applicable legal provisions, and the maximum possible penalty or the sentence imposed, as required under Article 83(2)(b)(v) of the RPD.

However, INTERPOL does not require supporting evidence to substantiate the underlying charges. It relies entirely on the information provided by the requesting National Central Bureau (NCB). As such, a Red Notice does not prove:

That the arrest warrant is valid under international law,

That the alleged crime was indeed committed (no proof of guilt),

That the case is free from political motivation or abuse of process.

What a Red Notice does prove is limited to the following: it simply indicates that the requesting country is a member of INTERPOL, that it has submitted a formal request through INTERPOL’s channels, and that, at the time of issuance, the request passed INTERPOL’s preliminary internal review without raising immediate concerns about political, military, religious, or racial motivations, or other violations of INTERPOL’s rules.

If you need more help feel free to contact us.


Related Posts

16

Dec
INTERPOL headquarters illustrating international police cooperation and cross-border law enforcement coordination
INTERPOL’s Jurisdiction and Objectives

INTERPOL does not have independent law enforcement jurisdiction and exercises no arrest, investigative, or executive powers. Established in the early twentieth century and restructured after World War II, INTERPOL’s mandate is limited to facilitating international police cooperation among its member states, in accordance with national laws and the INTERPOL Constitution. Under Article 2 of its …

5

Dec
Graphic illustrating the global misuse of INTERPOL Red Notices by authoritarian regimes and the risks individuals face when travelling internationally.
Red Notices: A Powerful Tool in Dangerous Hands

When a client facing an overseas criminal investigation (and possibly politically motivated) quietly asks, “Is it safe for me to travel?”, they are not expressing concern about logistical inconvenience. They are, often without realising it, raising a far deeper legal dilemma: whether the coercive reach of an abusive state can follow them across borders through …

30

Nov
A landscape view of Cyprus with coastal mountains, used to illustrate INTERPOL, extradition issues, and the occupied area of Northern Cyprus.
INTERPOL’s Blind Spot: Occupied Cyprus

As a Cypriot lawyer specialising in INTERPOL and cross-border criminal law, I am frequently asked whether extradition is possible from the occupied area of Cyprus, commonly referred to as “Northern Cyprus” or the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). The answer is clear and strictly legal: no. The so-called TRNC is recognised only by …

25

Nov
“Header image showing INTERPOL Red Notice and Yellow Notice symbols with the title ‘INTERPOL and Parental Child Abduction
INTERPOL and Parental Child Abduction

Parental Child Abduction International Parental Child Abduction (IPCA) represents one of the most challenging areas of cross-border family law. When a child is wrongfully removed to or retained in another jurisdiction without the other parent's consent, and informal or diplomatic efforts fail, the situation becomes legally complex and difficult to resolve. The paramount consideration must …

21

Nov
Analysis of INTERPOL’s immunity and the El Omari v. INTERPOL ruling on whether individuals can sue over abusive Red Notices.
Can You Sue INTERPOL?

As of 12 September 2025, the short answer remains No. An individual cannot sue INTERPOL for harm caused by the publication or circulation of a Red Notice. Despite the increasing number of people claiming that politically motivated or abusive notices have targeted them, INTERPOL is immune from legal proceedings before domestic courts. The most recent …

20

Nov
INTERPOL–UN Security Council Special Notice banner illustrating global sanctions enforcement.
INTERPOL and UN Sanctions: Any Relationship?

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) carries a unique mandate under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: the preservation of international peace and security. When military action is not appropriate, Article 41 empowers the Council to impose non-military sanctions, including asset freezes, arms embargoes, and travel bans. However, these measures only have real impact when …