Red Notice: Presumption of Guilt?

The existence of a Red Notice does not imply that the individual concerned is guilty. It must not be treated as evidence of guilt, in line with the Presumption of Innocence protected under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Individuals subject to Red Notices generally fall into one of the following categories: a) Suspects in a criminal investigation, b) Persons formally accused of an offence, c) individuals already convicted by a competent court.

Despite common public misconceptions, a Red Notice is not an international arrest warrant. It only serves as a mechanism to facilitate extradition and should be understood as an invitation to INTERPOL’s 196 member countries to assist in locating and, where permissible under national laws, provisionally arrest a person wanted for prosecution or to serve a sentence [(Articles 10.2 and 82 of INTERPOL’s Rules on the Processing of Data (RPD)].

To issue a Red Notice, the requesting country must provide a valid national arrest warrant or an equivalent judicial decision, along with a clear summary of the case. This includes the relevant facts, charges, applicable legal provisions, and the maximum possible penalty or the sentence imposed, as required under Article 83(2)(b)(v) of the RPD.

However, INTERPOL does not require supporting evidence to substantiate the underlying charges. It relies entirely on the information provided by the requesting National Central Bureau (NCB). As such, a Red Notice does not prove:

That the arrest warrant is valid under international law,

That the alleged crime was indeed committed (no proof of guilt),

That the case is free from political motivation or abuse of process.

What a Red Notice does prove is limited to the following: it simply indicates that the requesting country is a member of INTERPOL, that it has submitted a formal request through INTERPOL’s channels, and that, at the time of issuance, the request passed INTERPOL’s preliminary internal review without raising immediate concerns about political, military, religious, or racial motivations, or other violations of INTERPOL’s rules.

author avatar
Konstantina ZIVLA International Criminal Lawyer: INTERPOL & Extradition
Konstantina Zivla is an international criminal defence lawyer specialising in INTERPOL Red Notice removals, extradition law, and cross-border criminal cases. She represents clients across the UK, Europe, and internationally, advising on complex multi-jurisdictional matters involving international cooperation mechanisms.

Related Posts

17

Apr
Red Notices - Statistics
The Red Notices You Can’t See

Are all Red Notices Public? Two of the most common questions I encounter in practice are: (a) Will I be arrested if a Red Notice exists against me? (b) If my name does not appear on INTERPOL’s public website, does that mean I am not subject to a Red Notice? The first question is addressed …

6

Apr
Extradition and INTERPOL
5 Myths About Extradition

1st Myth: Extradition is automatic This is the most dangerous and most common misunderstanding. Extradition is not a favour between states. It is not a request that compels surrender, but only invites scrutiny. Extradition is a structured legal procedure governed by Bilateral/Multi-National Treaties [if any], domestic legislation, and constitutional principles. There is always a legality …

23

Feb
INTERPOL RED NOTICES - CRITERIA FOR PUBLICATION
INTERPOL Red Notices: Criteria for Publication

This article forms part of the series "Interpol Red Notices: An Anatomy of Power" published in the International Enforcement Law Reporter Blog on 12 February 2026. An INTERPOL Red Notice is one of the most serious international enforcement measures a person can face. Although technically described as a request to locate and provisionally arrest an …