INTERPOL and UN Sanctions: Any Relationship?

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) carries a unique mandate under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: the preservation of international peace and security. When military action is not appropriate, Article 41 empowers the Council to impose non-military sanctions, including asset freezes, arms embargoes, and travel bans. However, these measures only have real impact when those on the ground can effectively enforce them.

A significant step forward came in September 2005, when INTERPOL’s 74th General Assembly in Berlin approved the creation of the INTERPOL–UN Security Council Special Notice. This innovation transformed UN sanctions lists into operational policing tools, enabling law enforcement authorities worldwide to identify and track individuals and entities designated by the UNSC.

Special Notices provide detailed identifiers, such as names, aliases, photos, and, increasingly, biometric data [encouraged since UNSC Resolution 2399 (2017)], and circulate them securely to INTERPOL’s 196 member countries. Since 2005, more than 700 Special Notices have been issued.

The Berlin Assembly also endorsed incorporating UN sanctions information into INTERPOL’s existing notices, such as the Red Notice, increasing their visibility and strengthening international counter-terrorism efforts. These developments responded directly to UNSC Resolution 1617 (2005), which urged closer cooperation between INTERPOL and the United Nations to reinforce sanctions against Al-Qaida and the Taliban.

Nearly two decades later, the Special Notice remains a clear demonstration of effective multilateral cooperation. It shows how international law can move beyond resolutions on paper and become an actionable tool for frontline police. At the same time, it underscores a crucial reality: the success of UN sanctions depends entirely on their translation into practical enforcement mechanisms. Without that bridge, sanctions risk becoming symbolic. With it, they gain the visibility and operational reach necessary to have a real impact.

author avatar
Konstantina ZIVLA International Criminal Lawyer: INTERPOL & Extradition
Konstantina Zivla is an international criminal defence lawyer specialising in INTERPOL Red Notice removals, extradition law, and cross-border criminal cases. She represents clients across the UK, Europe, and internationally, advising on complex multi-jurisdictional matters involving international cooperation mechanisms.

Related Posts

17

Apr
Red Notices - Statistics
The Red Notices You Can’t See

Are all Red Notices Public? Two of the most common questions I encounter in practice are: (a) Will I be arrested if a Red Notice exists against me? (b) If my name does not appear on INTERPOL’s public website, does that mean I am not subject to a Red Notice? The first question is addressed …

6

Apr
Extradition and INTERPOL
5 Myths About Extradition

1st Myth: Extradition is automatic This is the most dangerous and most common misunderstanding. Extradition is not a favour between states. It is not a request that compels surrender, but only invites scrutiny. Extradition is a structured legal procedure governed by Bilateral/Multi-National Treaties [if any], domestic legislation, and constitutional principles. There is always a legality …

23

Feb
INTERPOL RED NOTICES - CRITERIA FOR PUBLICATION
INTERPOL Red Notices: Criteria for Publication

This article forms part of the series "Interpol Red Notices: An Anatomy of Power" published in the International Enforcement Law Reporter Blog on 12 February 2026. An INTERPOL Red Notice is one of the most serious international enforcement measures a person can face. Although technically described as a request to locate and provisionally arrest an …