A landscape view of Cyprus with coastal mountains, used to illustrate INTERPOL, extradition issues, and the occupied area of Northern Cyprus.

Konstantina Zivla

INTERPOL Red Notices Lawyer | Associate Member at Guernica 37 Chambers (G37) | ECtHR | World-Check & LexisNexis Data Removal | Research in Law Enforcement & Police Accountability | Member of DELF, ECBA, CBA & IBA

Share:

INTERPOL’s Blind Spot: Occupied Cyprus

As a Cypriot lawyer specialising in INTERPOL and cross-border criminal law, I am frequently asked whether extradition is possible from the occupied area of Cyprus, commonly referred to as “Northern Cyprus” or the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). The answer is clear and strictly legal: no.
The so-called TRNC is recognised only by Turkey. The United Nations, the European Union, and the entire international community recognise the Republic of Cyprus as the sole legitimate authority over the island. This political and legal reality creates a significant and often dangerous vacuum in international police cooperation, particularly in matters involving INTERPOL Notices and extradition.
Is extradition possible directly from the occupied area?
Legally, no. There is no recognised authority in the occupied part of Cyprus capable of signing or enforcing extradition treaties.
Does the Republic of Cyprus cooperate with the occupied area?
Again, legally, no. Any form of cooperation would amount to de facto recognition of an illegal entity.
What exactly is the so-called TRNC?
After the 1974 Turkish invasion, 37 % of the island fell under unlawful occupation. In 1983, the occupying administration proclaimed the so-called TRNC, an entity under Turkey’s effective control but without any international legitimacy. As a result, there are no formal international treaties, no judicial cooperation, no international oversight, and no access to INTERPOL databases.
This means criminal records cannot be verified, identities cannot be checked, and individuals flagged with INTERPOL Red Notices can enter or reside there freely. This is why the occupied area is repeatedly described as a “haven for fugitives”.
A safe “haven” for criminals
This legal vacuum has made the occupied area of Cyprus a well-known safe haven for fugitives wanted by INTERPOL. A clear example is S.M., a former Russian banker accused of embezzling 2.7 billion rubles. Although he had been the subject of an INTERPOL Red Notice since 2018, he lived openly in the occupied territory, using a forged Albanian passport to secure residency and purchase extensive real estate. Ultimately, following negotiations between Russia and Turkey, he was flown from “Ercan Airport” to Moscow on a private jet, escorted by Russian special forces and Turkish officers.
This case, one of many, demonstrates how the occupied area of Cyprus operates beyond the reach of international law. The lack of recognition of the so-called TRNC means no extradition treaties, no judicial cooperation, and no access to INTERPOL databases. This creates a dangerous law-enforcement gap that criminals can easily exploit. 
It also exposes a deeper paradox: an illegality (the invasion and continued occupation of Cyprus) that the international community cannot recognise, or INTERPOL produces a legal vacuum that enables fugitives, fraudsters, and organised crime networks to evade justice with ease.
 

If you need more help feel free to contact us.


Related Posts

25

Nov
“Header image showing INTERPOL Red Notice and Yellow Notice symbols with the title ‘INTERPOL and Parental Child Abduction
INTERPOL and Parental Child Abduction

Parental Child Abduction International Parental Child Abduction (IPCA) represents one of the most challenging areas of cross-border family law. When a child is wrongfully removed to or retained in another jurisdiction without the other parent's consent, and informal or diplomatic efforts fail, the situation becomes legally complex and difficult to resolve. The paramount consideration must …

21

Nov
Analysis of INTERPOL’s immunity and the El Omari v. INTERPOL ruling on whether individuals can sue over abusive Red Notices.
Can You Sue INTERPOL?

As of 12 September 2025, the short answer remains No. An individual cannot sue INTERPOL for harm caused by the publication or circulation of a Red Notice. Despite the increasing number of people claiming that politically motivated or abusive notices have targeted them, INTERPOL is immune from legal proceedings before domestic courts. The most recent …

20

Nov
INTERPOL–UN Security Council Special Notice banner illustrating global sanctions enforcement.
INTERPOL and UN Sanctions: Any Relationship?

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) carries a unique mandate under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: the preservation of international peace and security. When military action is not appropriate, Article 41 empowers the Council to impose non-military sanctions, including asset freezes, arms embargoes, and travel bans. However, these measures only have real impact when …

19

Nov
Interpol Blue Notices - INTERPOL Notices System
INTERPOL Blue Notices: How Do They Differ from Red Ones?

Among INTERPOL’s colour-coded notices, the Blue Notice has traditionally remained overshadowed by the better-known Red Notice. However, recent statistics show that the Blue Notice is rapidly becoming one of the fastest-expanding tools in international police cooperation. From 2014 to 2024, Blue Notices issued nearly doubled, from 2,167 to 4,078. This sharp rise signals a significant …

18

Nov
Infographic showing the INTERPOL Red Notice publication process, highlighting the request, review stage and decision before publication.
INTERPOL Red Notices: Before Publication

Before an INTERPOL Notice or Diffusion is published, it goes through a careful review to make sure it follows the rules, stays neutral and respects human rights. The process starts when a country sends a request through its National Central Bureau. The Notices and Diffusions Task Force (NDTF) then checks the request. First, it looks …

28

Oct
Red Notice lifted
Red Notice Lifted – When, and Then, What?

A Red Notice can be lifted in three ways: suspension/withdrawal, cancellation, and deletion. Particularly: 1. Suspension (Temporary) or Withdrawal of a Red Notice Under Article 81 of INTERPOL’s Rules on the Processing of Data (RPD), a National Central Bureau (NCB) or authorised international entity may suspend a Red Notice for up to six months by …