INTERPOL–UN Security Council Special Notice banner illustrating global sanctions enforcement.

Konstantina Zivla

INTERPOL Red Notices Lawyer | Associate Member at Guernica 37 Chambers (G37) | ECtHR | World-Check & LexisNexis Data Removal | Research in Law Enforcement & Police Accountability | Member of DELF, ECBA, CBA & IBA

Share:

INTERPOL and UN Sanctions: Any Relationship?

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) carries a unique mandate under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: the preservation of international peace and security. When military action is not appropriate, Article 41 empowers the Council to impose non-military sanctions, including asset freezes, arms embargoes, and travel bans. However, these measures only have real impact when those on the ground can effectively enforce them.

A significant step forward came in September 2005, when INTERPOL’s 74th General Assembly in Berlin approved the creation of the INTERPOL–UN Security Council Special Notice. This innovation transformed UN sanctions lists into operational policing tools, enabling law enforcement authorities worldwide to identify and track individuals and entities designated by the UNSC.

Special Notices provide detailed identifiers, such as names, aliases, photos, and, increasingly, biometric data [encouraged since UNSC Resolution 2399 (2017)], and circulate them securely to INTERPOL’s 196 member countries. Since 2005, more than 700 Special Notices have been issued.

The Berlin Assembly also endorsed incorporating UN sanctions information into INTERPOL’s existing notices, such as the Red Notice, increasing their visibility and strengthening international counter-terrorism efforts. These developments responded directly to UNSC Resolution 1617 (2005), which urged closer cooperation between INTERPOL and the United Nations to reinforce sanctions against Al-Qaida and the Taliban.

Nearly two decades later, the Special Notice remains a clear demonstration of effective multilateral cooperation. It shows how international law can move beyond resolutions on paper and become an actionable tool for frontline police. At the same time, it underscores a crucial reality: the success of UN sanctions depends entirely on their translation into practical enforcement mechanisms. Without that bridge, sanctions risk becoming symbolic. With it, they gain the visibility and operational reach necessary to have a real impact.

If you need more help feel free to contact us.


Related Posts

16

Dec
INTERPOL headquarters illustrating international police cooperation and cross-border law enforcement coordination
INTERPOL’s Jurisdiction and Objectives

INTERPOL does not have independent law enforcement jurisdiction and exercises no arrest, investigative, or executive powers. Established in the early twentieth century and restructured after World War II, INTERPOL’s mandate is limited to facilitating international police cooperation among its member states, in accordance with national laws and the INTERPOL Constitution. Under Article 2 of its …

5

Dec
Graphic illustrating the global misuse of INTERPOL Red Notices by authoritarian regimes and the risks individuals face when travelling internationally.
Red Notices: A Powerful Tool in Dangerous Hands

When a client facing an overseas criminal investigation (and possibly politically motivated) quietly asks, “Is it safe for me to travel?”, they are not expressing concern about logistical inconvenience. They are, often without realising it, raising a far deeper legal dilemma: whether the coercive reach of an abusive state can follow them across borders through …

30

Nov
A landscape view of Cyprus with coastal mountains, used to illustrate INTERPOL, extradition issues, and the occupied area of Northern Cyprus.
INTERPOL’s Blind Spot: Occupied Cyprus

As a Cypriot lawyer specialising in INTERPOL and cross-border criminal law, I am frequently asked whether extradition is possible from the occupied area of Cyprus, commonly referred to as “Northern Cyprus” or the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). The answer is clear and strictly legal: no. The so-called TRNC is recognised only by …

25

Nov
“Header image showing INTERPOL Red Notice and Yellow Notice symbols with the title ‘INTERPOL and Parental Child Abduction
INTERPOL and Parental Child Abduction

Parental Child Abduction International Parental Child Abduction (IPCA) represents one of the most challenging areas of cross-border family law. When a child is wrongfully removed to or retained in another jurisdiction without the other parent's consent, and informal or diplomatic efforts fail, the situation becomes legally complex and difficult to resolve. The paramount consideration must …

21

Nov
Analysis of INTERPOL’s immunity and the El Omari v. INTERPOL ruling on whether individuals can sue over abusive Red Notices.
Can You Sue INTERPOL?

As of 12 September 2025, the short answer remains No. An individual cannot sue INTERPOL for harm caused by the publication or circulation of a Red Notice. Despite the increasing number of people claiming that politically motivated or abusive notices have targeted them, INTERPOL is immune from legal proceedings before domestic courts. The most recent …

19

Nov
Interpol Blue Notices - INTERPOL Notices System
INTERPOL Blue Notices: How Do They Differ from Red Ones?

Among INTERPOL’s colour-coded notices, the Blue Notice has traditionally remained overshadowed by the better-known Red Notice. However, recent statistics show that the Blue Notice is rapidly becoming one of the fastest-expanding tools in international police cooperation. From 2014 to 2024, Blue Notices issued nearly doubled, from 2,167 to 4,078. This sharp rise signals a significant …